If You’re Wondering What To Get Me For Xmas

As if there’s any question? It’s what all the cool kids want…

Talking Jesus Messenger of Faith

Because Women Need Men To Tell Them to Make Pies and Other Stuff

Finally, a man who gets the the whole Edwards blogger thing. Craig Richardson knows the source of true feminism, the virgin Mary.

“While these two women were clearly selective in hand picking the worst of the e-mails they received, I too was horrified by the level of hatred put forth by those who purport to defend the Church and the pro-life cause.”

How dare they use negative emails to prove their point! I’m sure they somehow made this all up.

“I find it ironic as these two women left their post on the campaign to continue ‘defending the rights of women,’ whatever that means, Pope Benedict XVI dedicated his Wednesday public audience to highlighting the essential role women have played in Church history”

Because the Pope knows what’s best for women, more than women do… he’s da Pope, after all.

“These great contributors to Christianity didn’t view their femininity and ability to rear children as a curse but people who God had handpicked for a unique and saving role for humanity.”

I don’t think I’ve ever heard Melissa or Amanda ever say that the ability to give birth was a curse, but I’m sure they think it, because they’re both foul mouthed lesbian snatchomites.

“According to the Vatican Information Service (VIS), the Pope today said: ‘The history of Christianity would have developed quite differently without the generous contribution of many women’…and he recalled how John Paul II had written: ‘The Church gives thanks for each and every woman … for all the manifestations of the feminine “genius”.’

Because feminine and masculine “genius” are different. “Go bake me a pie, genius!”

“I actually feel sorry for Amanda and Melissa. They will never realize their true femininity and its awesome power if they continue to be mired in this failed and dying philosophy of radical feminism that has trapped so many women of my generation.”

Ya, you dumb bitches! Get back in the kitchen, make me a pie, and squirt out a couple of kids while your at it! Feel the awesome power of Jesus as contractions rock your uterus! Those poor trapped women that have chosen not to learn to make pies and squirt babies out their uterus. And to think they want equal pay for equal work! Sheesh, they’re so stupid, they don’t even know what they’re missing out on. Here I thought feminine meant a characteristic of or appropriate or unique to women. Hell, it must mean pies and babies.

“As the Virgin Mary so beautifully demonstrated, being truly feminine doesn’t mean being subservient to anyone except for almighty God.”

I don’t think I recieved the updated bible without Ephesians 5:23 in it. “For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior.”

God punished you for a reason, ya apple eating whores. Please, just remember your place, pie’s and baby squirts… bitches.

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/qwirWWnzJKM" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

I Think I’m In Love

I’ve searched among the masses to find the woman that I could fall in love with, and I almost did! Alas…she is married. I don’t think she’s polyamorous either. Shame.

Three things really amused me about this person.

1. She doesn’t address any of the scripture that I posted in her blog. Most likely it’s either because she doesn’t know her scripture or only picks out what scripture upholds her hatred and bigotry. The words that pour out her mouth betray her own scripture. If I am the man she says I am, she obviously is commanded to shut up. “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” 1 Timothy 2:12

2. She posted a response in the comments of her blog, under anonymous. She claims to be intelligent but doesn’t even log in to her own blog!

3. She posts a picture of me, from like 4 billion years ago, but I don’t see one pic of her on her website. I think someone is jealous.

Jesus Loves Me….

But not you…

Running Around The Church With Scissors

Lots of tranny/Jesus chatter on the internets.

Over at “The Cafeteria Is Closed” Gerald Augustinus comments on a BBC story about an Anglican reverend that transitioned on the job. He quips:

“Obviously, that person has some deep-seated issues, why else would he have wanted to become a mannish looking elderly lady.”

and then wonders what the Vatican’s position on sex change procedures is. He cited a press release from the John Norton Catholic News Service:

“The key point is that the (transsexual) surgical operation is so superficial and external that it does not change the personality. If the person was male, he remains male. If she was female, she remains female,”

The Vatican text defines transsexualism as a psychic disorder of those whose genetic makeup and physical characteristics are unambiguously of one sex but who feel that they belong to the
opposite sex. In some cases, the urge is so strong that the person undergoes a “sex-change” operation to acquire the opposite sex’s external sexual organs. The new organs have no reproductive function.”

In the comments “berrien” says:

Sick, sick, sick. Better keep an eye on him….uh, her,…uh, it. Good thing he got the knife before he came into the church and got transfered to the Catholic priesthood, eh?

My response:

First of all, Peter is Anglican, not Catholic, correct?

I’m not a theologian, I just play one on the internets.

As far as “genital mutilation,” I’m not that familiar with Catholic doctrine, but I know that the Bible speaks specifically to this:

Matthew 19:12 “For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”

“Sick, sick, sick. Better keep an eye on him….uh, her,…uh, it“

Nice. Might explain why Catholicism and Christianity in general is in decline.

Christ never dehumanized, never condemned, never mocked those in sin.

Now, I would note that I do not believe in sin. To believe in sin, you need to believe in the existence of God, which I don’t.

Over at POWERBLOG! “Powerball” complains about parents who let their gender dysphoric children live in their chosen gender. He states it’s

“one of those stories that make you pull your hair out.”

Rob commented:

Often, these children are actually hermaphroditic, and the parents are simply hiding this information from people who really don’t need to know.

I responded to them both:

Why would you pull your hair out? Your blog seems to indicate that you’re a Christian American, yet you don’t seem to support free will choice? Does the Constitution or the Bible somehow make this decision by parents and health care professionals any of your business?

Rob, in all fairness, there’s a big difference between gender identity disorder and an intersex condition. I’m about as left wing as they come, but lets not muddy the waters between the two conditions.

GID isn’t something that’s just dreamed up in the heads of the parents. It’s a known, mental disorder that is treatable. What this debate centers around is science vs faith. You’re talking about a group of people that believe that carbon dating is conspiracy against God, and the Earth is 4000 years old. If you can’t agree on carbon dating, then there’s no way you’re going to come to a concensus on this.

This a battle of reason verses faith, plain and simple.

Well, unless you’re trying to carbon date something….

Why Reason and Fact Don’t Matter

It’s obvious to me that evangelical right wing Christians don’t care about fact or reason… in fact they don’t care about children either. USA Today recently wrote a story about how gay adoption bans in are being considered in 16 states. No mind that there are 120,000 children in foster care and only 50,000 find permanent homes each year. Never mind that American Academy of Pediatrics, the Child Welfare League of America, and the American Psychiatric Association provide statistical data that shows that gay and lesbian parents are just as fit and parent just as well as their heterosexual counterparts.

Gays and lesbians shouldn’t be parents! Why? Because Jesus said so!

They Fired Me Because I Hate Queers

Two former members of the Indianapolis Star’s editorial board, James Patterson and Lisa Coffey, have claiming the Star discriminated against them based on their religious views. James Patterson said “This is America. We have the right, under the first amendment, to express those views. At a newspaper, which has had a conservative voice for years and years and years, our argument is we should be allowed to express those views without being persecuted.”

Persecuted? Christians in the Sudan have been persecuted for their religious views. I think Mr Patterson needs an education on what persecution is. An opinion writer does have the right to SAY what ever they like but the paper has no legal duty to publish it. Furthermore, the Star has no legal obligation to keep a Christian on staff just because of their religious affiliation.

Mr Patterson went on to say that “The Star not only discriminated against me, but they actually have waged a campaign people with strong Christian beliefs. Both of us were editorial board members and we should have the right.” “We should have the right to express our religious views, especially as opinion writers. That’s what opinions are for right?”

It’s ironic that fundamentalist Christians are running around crying about employment discrimination yet they were the main opponents of Prop 68 (which would have banned employment and housing discrimination).

read more

Bring On The Boxcars

The leader of a conservative Christian lobby group appears to suggest that gays should be required to wear warning labels.

Jefferson Vs The Religious Right

Dr Albert Mohler Jr.

“In the case Lawrence V. Texas, the Supreme Court of the United States of America struck down every sodomy law in this country. You see, they found the Constitutional right to sodomy. Does anyone believe that the framers of our Constitution intended for it to be there? By no means. Well if it’s not there, how did the court decision get there? By reading into the Constitution what they wanted to find, which isn’t there, but is constructed there, by expanding the Constitution by re-interpretation. Now, of all people, we ought to be the folks who understand that. Because we as Christians have had to understand there are people who will take the word of God, and say it’s really not about the text. It’s about what’s behind the text. We can take the text and make it say what it doesn’t mean. We have seen that pattern. And God’s people have had to learn to discern and say, no, the text is the inerrant and infallible word of God. It is what God said it is, and what God revealed it to be. And that’s what must constrain our interpretations. God bless you for believing that and affirming that.”

Thomas Jefferson:

“I never will, by any word or act, bow to the shrine of intolerance or admit a right of inquiry into the religious opinions of others.” –Thomas Jefferson to Edward Dowse, 1803. ME 10:378

“Whenever… preachers, instead of a lesson in religion, put [their congregation] off with a discourse on the Copernican system, on chemical affinities, on the construction of government, or the characters or conduct of those administering it, it is a breach of contract, depriving their audience of the kind of service for which they are salaried, and giving them, instead of it, what they did not want, or, if wanted, would rather seek from better sources in that particular art of science.” –Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815. ME 14:281

“I am really mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, a fact like this [i.e., the purchase of an apparent geological or astronomical work] can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too, as an offense against religion; that a question about the sale of a book can be carried before the civil magistrate. Is this then our freedom of religion? and are we to have a censor whose imprimatur shall say what books may be sold, and what we may buy? And who is thus to dogmatize religious opinions for our citizens? Whose foot is to be the measure to which ours are all to be cut or stretched? Is a priest to be our inquisitor, or shall a layman, simple as ourselves, set up his reason as the rule for what we are to read, and what we must believe? It is an insult to our citizens to question whether they are rational beings or not, and blasphemy against religion to suppose it cannot stand the test of truth and reason. If [this] book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God’s sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we choose.” –Thomas Jefferson to N. G. Dufief, 1814. ME 14:127

“History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.” –Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 1813. ME 14:21

“In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.” –Thomas Jefferson to Horatio G. Spafford, 1814. ME 14:119

I’m wondering when Jefferson’s writings will go to the Ministry of Truth… I remember reading 1984 but now I’m living it.

For The Love of Christ

It was brought to my attention yesterday that a few members of the GLBT community had emailed the fifth district city council member Ginny Cain, concerning Prop 68 (the Indianapolis Human Rights ordinance). She said:

“I will always discriminate against unhealthy addictive behaviors.”

“Most importantly, I love Jesus because He gave His all for me, and so I will give my all for Him in honoring why He created sex to be within the boundaries of heterosexual marriage. He came to rescue us from our unhealthiness/sins. I will vote NO!”

“It is never helpful to condone and justify someone’s unhealthy chosen addiction. Homosexuality is an addiction to unhealthy sexual behavior. It can be overcome with proper treatment. Check out Exodus International for confirmation of this.”

“The Bible is clear that sex was created and intended within the confines of heterosexual marriage. It is meant to mirror our relationship to our Creator. Who would want to pervert that? Satan… is the author of sin. Jesus came to overcome sin’s power over us so that we can live and live abundantly! He came to rescue us…not condemn us. Thus, we need to help those who are entrapped in any kind of unhealthy lifestyle. I will never support something that is meant
for destruction of human beings and our civilization.”

Prop 68 isn’t about marriage. Even if one wants to make this about marriage, the logic still doesn’t fly. The standard line put forth by fundamentalist Christians is that it is the responsibility of the government to codify and support the growth of strong families through civil marriage. Is marriage strictly a matter of reproduction? I have experienced being in a heterosexual marriage and I’d venture to say that most heterosexual couples marry because they are “in love”, not to reproduce. In our modern day society, reproduction is seen as an
outgrowth of the love within a marriage, not the other way around. These so called “shotgun marriages” (marriages that come about from pregnancy) are looked on with distained within present day society.

I do understand where Councilor Cain is coming from though. I have a very traditional history, before coming out transgender. I was raised to believe that gays and lesbians were promiscuously fractured adults that were stunted in their psychological development. I believed that homosexuals couldn’t love a same sex partner the way I loved my wife. Unfortunately my beliefs were built to support my own fears and self hatred. My observations were based on ignorance and lacked any real life exposure. They were simply constructs to fit my beliefs. I believe that Mrs. Cain suffers from much the same thing. Luckily I’ve been educated by others.

Saturday night I had one such “education.” I attended a silent auction (held for Rock Indiana Campaign for Equality) during the IndyIndie event at Jesus MCC church. Jan Williams and her partner Val also attended the auction/show. I’ve worked with Jan on the two dollar bill campaign but I’ve never seen them in a social setting. Seeing them interact together, their love for each other was obvious. I came to learn that Jan and Val have been in a committed relationship for 15 years. I began to survey the room and observed many couples that emitted this same kind of light that is given off by a couple that shares a deep love for one another. Such relationships are testaments of commitment that gays and lesbians live every day. It’s obvious to me today that Jan and Val’s love for each other isn’t one borne out of promiscuity or any other kind of unhealthy behavior, but borne out of love.

I lived and observed the “heterosexual Christian lifestyle” that Miss Cain, advocates. Since coming to terms with my transsexuality I’ve also been exposed to many flavors of family from within the GLBT community. The most ironic of observations is that I’ve felt more of “Christ’s love” from with the GLBT community, than from self professed Christians. They’re too busy being Pharasitical in their damnation to fulfill Christ’s ultimate mission of love. Jesus never spoke about homosexuality. His ministry was centered on love, not laws.

Christian “family values” should be based on Christ’s admonishment to “Love one another, as I have loved you.” Christian fundamentalists can spout 1 Corinthians 6:9 from memory, but can they do the same with Romans 13:8? (”Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law.”) Jesus repeatedly broke the laws of within the Jewish faith. He did it for reasons of love. His message was transparent. It was a message that love trumps the law. Marriage isn’t a contract (or covenant) of pregnancy. When two people marry they take a vow “to love and comfort,” to “honor and keep in sickness and in health”, to
“forsake all others,” and to “be faithful as long as both shall live.” The standard of marriage is one of love, not an ability to bring forth children. Marriage is not a covenant of child production, but of love.

Whatever Councilor Cain argues, it’s obvious that it doesn’t come from a position of love, and certainly not from any kind of “agape” or spiritual love. Prop 68 isn’t about marriage. It isn’t about sex. It’s about having some human compassion and understanding for your fellow man. It’s about not sanctioning hatred of another human being. Mrs. Cain’s fundamentalist ranting misses the boat. If she wants to speak of Christ’s love, then she needs to start showing some consistency in her own words and deeds. Can she love another, as Christ loved her, by denying another human being their most basic civil rights?